Saturday, June 12, 2004
 
So-Called Watch

From the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, in a story entitled Slay, Blunt butt heads over early voting plan:
    However, Blunt, the favored Republican candidate for governor, said the law merely set the framework for early voting but did not give statutory authority for it. It also did not provide funding for early balloting, a possible violation of the so-called Hancock Amendment, which requires the state to pay for anything that it is requiring local jurisdictions to do. Early voting would cost about $2.4 million, according to estimates from local officials that Blunt compiled in 2002.
I think this writer is trying to use so-called as a synonym for "law commonly known as", which is rather funny, since the writer probably doesn't know it by any other name.

This link was sent to me by reader John F. Donigan, who seems to lament the fact that officials from the city of St. Louis want election day to last two weeks, and might have a law to stand on. Donigan writes:
    KMOX ran a story in which the picketers stated that Blunt wasn't allowing early voting because he was a Republican. Blunt answered with something on the order of "You could come to me as the most Republican-voting city in the state, (not that I can think of one at the moment) and I'd still have to say you can't do it." The picketers responded with It's our right 'cause we want it!

    *sigh*
I cannot take an experiential historical perspective to know if these sorts of shenanigans have always been a part of the electoral process; I suspect though that politics now trumps government in ways that it has not before, and in ways that will ultimately lead to the implosion of the Great Experiment.

 
To say Noggle, one first must be able to say the "Nah."