Some Missouri Legislators Find Checks and Balances Too Confining
Our saga so far:
- Missouri Legislative Branch passes concealed carry law.
- Missouri Executive Branch vetoes concealed carry law.
- Missouri Legislative Branch overcomes veto by getting 2/3 majority. Barely, as Carol Daniel pointed out.
What's missing from this picture? Ah, yes, the Judicial Branch. Someone had to sue, but what do you know, it's
state legislators.
That's right. They opposed the legislation, but they couldn't vote it down. Then they couldn't prevent its veto from being overridden. So now that their part in the grand scheme that is the American system of government is over, do they lose graciously to the will of the legislative majority? Of course not, they do an end-run around the system and do their part to help unbalance the system so that we have a totalitarian judgeocracy.
Face it, it would be easier to spot if they got together with members of the executive branch to subvert the republican form of government and have a Strong Leader issue fiats and maybe even dissolve that useless legislature anyway. Instead, these
legislators want to overturn in the courts something they couldn't stop in the legislature
by any possible method.
I wouldn't be so bothered if some citizens group or even HCI or its brethren filed the suit. But that the
legislators, who probably would tell us how sad they are that The Children don't understand civics and the working of the government, are doing it twists my leash most of all.